• Maomao Cai Weber State University, Ogden, UT 84408, USA


Most learning models have been relied on students’ individual studying activities. In those models, the efficiency of learning varies among different students, and thusis limited. In this paper, we propose a systematic group study model to improve the learning efficiency for diversity students. By using instructed in-class and out-of-class group work, the group study model has the advantages to overcome the shortages of the individual study modelsand can improve the study efficiency for diversity students. Furthermore, in this model, students can learn from the group as well as from the instructors, thus the teaching performance can be improved. In experimental results, we use statistical analysis to show the improvement of teaching performance and study efficiency for the proposed group study model.

Keywords: Group Study model, diversity students, in-class and out-of-class group work.


Barton, J. (1995). Conducting effective classroom discussions. Journal of Reading, 38(5), 346-350.

Bernstein, L., Rappaport, C. D., Olsho, L., Hunt, D., & Levin, M. (2009). Impact Evaluation of the US Department of Education's Student Mentoring Program. Final Report. NCEE 2009-4047. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University Washington, DC.

Boylan, H. R. (2011). Improving Success in Developmental Mathematics: An Interview with Paul Nolting. Journal of Developmental Education, 34(3), 20-27.

Brown, A. L., & Palincsar, A. S. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser, 393-451.


Ciampa, M., & Revels, M. (2013). The Effect of Self-Remediation Activities on Undergraduate Student Retention. Kentucky Journal of Excellence in College Teaching and Learning, 10(2012), 7.

Clearinghouse, W. W. (2008). WWC procedures and standards handbook. Washington, DC: Retrieved January, 1, 2009.

Corey, G. (2011). Theory & practice of group counseling: Thomson Brooks/Cole.

Dreifus, C. (2008). In professor’s model, diversity= productivity. New York Times.

Edmondson, A. C. (1996). Learning from mistakes is easier said than done: Group and organizational influences on the detection and correction of human error. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 32(1), 5-28.

Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual review of psychology, 60, 549-576.

Gupta, N. (2012). Team responses to noncontributing members: The effects of attribution and knowledge overlap. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16(3), 172.

Gurin, P., Dey, E. L., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330-367.

Hollingshead, A. B., Brandon, D. P., Yoon, K., & Gupta, N. (2011). Communication and Knowledge-sharing Errors in Groups. Communication and Organizational Knowledge, 133-150.

Hong, L., & Page, S. E. (2004). Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(46), 16385-16389.

Klein, P. D. (2003). Rethinking the multiplicity of cognitive resources and curricular representations: alternatives to'learning styles' and'multiple intelligences'. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), 45-81.

Levin, H. M., & Calcagno, J. C. (2008). Remediation in the Community College An Evaluator's Perspective. Community College Review, 35(3), 181-207.

Levin, H. M., & Koski, W. S. (1998). Administrative approaches to educational productivity. New Directions for Higher Education, 1998(103), 9-21.

Meyer, R., & Krueger, D. (2001). Minitab guide to statistics: Prentice Hall PTR.

Page, S. E. (2008). The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies (New Edition): Princeton University Press.

Pilkington, R., Bennett, C., & Vaughan, S. (2000). An evaluation of computer mediated communication to support group discussion in continuing education. Educational Technology & Society, 3(3), 349-360.

Pope Jr, H. G., Hudson, J. I., Jonas, J. M., & Yurgelun-Todd, D. (1983). Bulimia treated with imipramine: a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Am J Psychiatry, 140(5), 554-558.

Puma, M. J., Olsen, R. B., Bell, S. H., & Price, C. (2009). What to Do when Data Are Missing in Group Randomized Controlled Trials. NCEE 2009-0049. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

Rajan, N., & Marcus, L. (2009). Student Attitudes and Learning Outcomes from Process Oriented Guided-Inquiry Learning (POGIL) Strategy in an Introductory Chemistry Course for Non-Science Majors: An Action Research Study. The Chemical Educator, 14, 85-93.

Rohfeld, R., & Hiemstra, R. (1995). Moderating discussions in the electronic classroom.

Rohfeld, R. W., & Hiemstra, R. (1994). Moderating discussions in the electronic classroom. Computer mediated communication and the online classroom, 3, 91-104.

Schoen, H. L. (1976). Self-paced mathematics instruction: how effective has it been? The Arithmetic Teacher, 23(2), 90-96.

Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 69(1), 21-51.

Torgerson, D. J., & Torgerson, C. J. (2003). Avoiding bias in randomised controlled trials in educational research. The British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(1), 36-45.

Vandrick, S. (2000). Language, Culture, Class, Gender, and Class Participation. Paper presented at the TESOL Annual International Convention, Vancouver, Canada.

Yalom, I. D., & Leszcz, M. (2008). The Theory and Practice of Group Psychotherapy: Basic Books.






Research Article