VALIDITY OF THE SCIENTIFIC CREATIVITY PROJECT BASED LEARNING (SiPjBL) MODEL IN PHYSICS LEARNING TO INCREASE THE SCIENTIFIC CREATIVITY OF PHYSICS EDUCATION UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS IN INTRODUCTORY PHYSICS COURSES 1

Abstract

This study aims to describe the validity of the SiPjBL model developed from the PjBL model based on the development needs and the sophistication of science. The method in this study is the development method of Borg and Gall, which is modified according to the needs of model development. The data collection technique is carried out using the model validation method. This research instrument uses a model validation sheet. The validation sheet contains statements that refer to aspects of development needs and aspects of the sophistication of science. Three validators then fill in the validation sheet according to their respective fields of expertise. Data analysis is carried out quantitatively descriptively by calculating the score on each component of each aspect of the model. The validation results by three validators obtained an average score of 3.92 with a very valid category, and the percentage of the feasibility of the SiPjBL model reached 97%. Thus, the SiPjBL model is feasible to implement in higher education's learning process.

Keywords: validity, SiPjBL model, scientific creativity.

REFERENCES  

Andayani, S. (2020). The profile of critical thinking and learning outcomes of teacher candidates viewed from gender differences. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1567, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042072.

Andres, E. C. A., & Rosalinda, B. (2023). Online Flipped Learning Model in a College Physical Education Course. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 413–425.

Arend, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach. In Mc Graw Hill (Ninth Edit, Vol. 11, Issue 1). http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-59379-1%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420070-8.00002-7%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2015.03.024%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2018.1441103%0Ahttp://www.chile.bmw-motorrad.cl/sync/showroom/lam/es/

Borg, W.R & Gall, M. . (1983). Eucation research: an introduction. (4th Editio). Longman Inc.

Cirkony, C. (2023). Flexible, creative, constructive, and collaborative: the makings of an authentic science inquiry task. International Journal of Science Education, 45(17), 1440–1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2213384

Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school. 24, 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912

Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2010). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912

Maharani Putri Kumalasani, & Kusumaningtyas, D. I. (2022). 21 St Century Skill In Learning Models With A Steam Approach. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar, 05(April), 74–81.

Moreno, F. E. (2021). Learning electrical circuits for the development of critical thinking. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2073, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2073/1/012001

Moreno, R. (2010). Educational psichology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Mukhopadhyay, R. (2013). Scientific Creativity- A New Emerging Field of Research : Some Considerations. 2(1), 1–9.

PISA. (2023). PISA 2022 Results Factsheets Indonesia. The Language of Science Education, 1, 1–9. https://oecdch.art/a40de1dbaf/C108.

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. M. (2010). An introduction to educational design research.

Prahani, B. K., Suprapto, N., Rachmadiarti, F., Sholahuddin, A., Mahtari, S., Suyidno, & Siswanto, J. (2021). Online Scientific Creativity Learning (OSCL) in Science Education to Improve Students’ Scientific Creativity in Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(Special Issue), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.73

Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemendikbud. (2019). Pendidikan di Indonesia Belajar dari Hasil PISA 2018. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemendikbud, 021, 1–206.

Rahayu, R., Iskandar, S., & Abidin, Y. (2022). Inovasi Pembelajaran Abad 21 dan Penerapannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2099–2104. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2082

Sidek, R., Halim, L., Buang, N. A., & Mohamad Arsad, N. (2020). Fostering Scientific Creativity in Teaching and Learning Science in Schools: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i1.7149

Slavin, R. E. (2015). Instruction Based on Cooperative Learning. Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction, 388–404. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839089.ch17

Sumo, M., Jatmiko, B., Supardi, Z. A. I., & Suprianto, S. (2024). The Influence Of The Project-Based Learning Model On The Scientific Creativity Of Physics Education Undergraduate Students At Madura Islamic University. SEJ (Science Education Journal), 8(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v8i2.1651

Suradika., Dwi., N. (2023). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 12(1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.39713

Suyidno, Nur, M., Yuanita, L., & Prahani,  binar kurnia. (2018). Issn 1648-3898 Issn 2538-7138 Effectiveness of Creative Responsibility Based Teaching ( Crbt ) Model on Basic Physics Learning To Increase Student ’ S Scientific Creativity and. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 136–151.

Test, P., Sak, U., & Ayas, M. B. (2014). Creative Scientific Ability Test ( C-SAT ): A new measure of scientific creativity Creative Scientific Ability Test ( C-SAT ): A new measure of scientific creativity. September 2013.

Wahyuni, L., & Rahayu, Y. S. (2021). Pengembangan E-Book Berbasis Project Based Learning (PjBL) untuk Melatihkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif pada Materi Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Tumbuhan Kelas XII SMA. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 10(2), 314–325. https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v10n2.p314-325

Wibowo, F. C. (2023). Journal of Technology and Science Education. 13(1), 178–192.

Wicaksono, I. (2020). Validity and Practicality of the Biotechnology Series Learning Model to Concept Mastery and Scientific Creativity. 13(3), 157–170.